Uniquely Precise: Importance of Conceptual Knowledge and Mathematical Language

Tod Shockey*, Sekhar S. Pindiprolu**
* Associate Professor, Department of Curriculum and Instruction and Department of Mathematics and Statistics, The University of Toledo, Ohio, United States.
** Professor, Department of Early Childhood and Special Education, The University of Toledo, Ohio, United States.
Periodicity:June - August'2015
DOI : https://doi.org/10.26634/jsch.11.1.3552

Abstract

The importance of mathematical concept development and language is recognized early in children's schooling as they mature through shape and counting experiences. The reader may recall instances of a youngster referring to a “corner” of a shape before the reader has the language of vertex. This language precision needs to continue to grow as the learner moves through arithmetic into algebra, geometry, and further mathematics. This precision is essential and is reinforced in the common core standards for mathematics (2010). If the primary goal is to facilitate proficiency in math for all students (including students with disabilities), there needs to be an emphasis on the deeper conceptual development and the uniquely precise nature of mathematics language both at the pre-service and in-service levels. This is essential as literature suggests that there is a significant relationship between teachers' mathematical knowledge and student achievement. The lack of teachers' mathematical knowledge prevents explicit instruction in the area of math concepts and/or a lack of focus on the mathematical language. This in turn causes barriers for k-12 students as they advance in the math curriculum. In this paper, the authors will discuss (a) the importance of mathematical concept development and language; (b) provide an example of a lack of precise conceptual understanding of prime number among pre-service teacher math educators; and (c) list explicit strategies that can be used to facilitate both the conceptual and language development at the pre-service level.

Keywords

Mathematics Language, Pre-service Teachers, Common Core Math Standards, Conceptual Knowledge, Prime Numbers

How to Cite this Article?

Shockey,.T. and Pindiprolu,.S. (2015). Uniquely Precise: Importance of Conceptual Knowledge and Mathematical Language. i-manager’s Journal on School Educational Technology, 11(1), 28-33. https://doi.org/10.26634/jsch.11.1.3552

References

[1]. Bernstein, B. (1996). Pedagogy, symbolic control and identity. London: Taylor & Francis.
[2]. Carney, M. B., Brendefur, J. L., Thiede, K., Hughes, G., & Sutton, J. (2014). Statewide mathematics professional development: teacher knowledge, self-efficacy, and beliefs. Educational Policy, pp. 1-34. doi 10.1177/ 0895904814550075
[3]. Cramer, E., &Nevin, A. (2006). “A mixed methodology analysis of co-teacher assessments”. Teacher Education and Special Education, Vol. 29, No. 4, pp. 261-274.
[4]. CEC Policy Insider (2013). “NAEP results show wide achievement gaps between students with, without disabilities”. Retrieved from http://www.policyinsider.org/ 2013/11/naep-results-show-wide-achievement-gapsbetween- students-with-without-disabilities.html
[5]. Cimbricz, S. (2013). Academic language. Retrieved from https://www.brockport.edu/oat/docs/ ALanguage_Cimbricz%20FINAL1.pdf
[6]. Garrison, L., & Mora, J. K. (1999). “Adapting mathematics instruction for English language learners: The language-concept connections”. In W.G. Secada, L. Oritz- Franco, N. G. Hernandex, and Y. De La Cruz (Eds.), Changing the faces of mathematics: Perspectives on Latinos. Reston, VA.
[7]. Hill, H. C., Rowan, B., & Ball, D. L. (2005). “Effects of Teachers' mathematical knowledge for teaching on student achievement”. American Educational Research Journal, Vol. 42(2), pp. 371-406
[8]. Imm, K., & Stylianon, D. (2012). “Talking mathematically: Analysis of discourse communities. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, Vol. 31, pp. 130-148.
[9]. Kranda, J. (2008). Precise mathematical language: Exploring the relationship between student vocabulary understanding and achievement. Unpublished MA thesis, Department of teaching, learning, and teacher Education, University of Nebraska-Lincoln.
[10]. Merino, N., & Zozakiewicz (2015). Academic language: Making working sense of expectations for candidates in the edTPA. Retrieved from http://www. uwsp.edu/education/Documents/ edTPA/Resource5.pdf
[11]. National Governors Association Center for Best Practices & Council of Chief State School Officers. (2010). Common Core State Standards. Washington, DC: Authors.
[12]. Schleppegrell, M. J. (2010). “Language in mathematics teaching and learning: a research review”. Language and Mathematics Education: Multiple perspectives and directions for research (pp. 73-112). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing
[13]. U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics (2013). Fast Facts. Retrieved from https://nces.ed.gov/fastfacts/display.asp?id=59
If you have access to this article please login to view the article or kindly login to purchase the article

Purchase Instant Access

Single Article

North Americas,UK,
Middle East,Europe
India Rest of world
USD EUR INR USD-ROW
Pdf 35 35 200 20
Online 35 35 200 15
Pdf & Online 35 35 400 25

Options for accessing this content:
  • If you would like institutional access to this content, please recommend the title to your librarian.
    Library Recommendation Form
  • If you already have i-manager's user account: Login above and proceed to purchase the article.
  • New Users: Please register, then proceed to purchase the article.