The First Encounters of Primary School Students and Parents in Blended English Classes

Semra Aydin*, Ayfer Su-Bergil**
* Ministry of National Education, Amasya, Turkey.
** Department of Foreign Language Education, Amasya University, Amasya, Turkey.
Periodicity:January - March'2023
DOI : https://doi.org/10.26634/jelt.13.1.19073

Abstract

This study investigates what blended English learning, the first of its kind at their school, means to primary school students and their parents. It aims to demonstrate how they experience and perceive blended English classes, particularly during their first encounter, in order to conceptualise the most commonly perceived benefits and to challenge the existing theoretical framework, Social Presence Theory. This study was conducted to help shareholders, specifically in a primarylevel English language education context, to exclude or reduce the barriers and maximise the benefits. To this end, a cross-sectional survey design was adopted, and 147 students and 138 parents participated in this study. Data was collected through questionnaires and calculated using the SPSS program. The data showed that primary school students and parents were generally pleased with their blended English class experiences. They found blended English learning experiences to be valuable and enhance their learning, especially in critical periods such as the COVID-19 pandemic. However, the face-to-face format is perceived more positively because of the limitations and challenges of blended and online English classes in terms of interactions and social elements. Based on the results, some implications and suggestions for further research are provided.

Keywords

Blended English, Blended Learning, Hybrid English Teaching, Hybrid Teaching, Primary School Students, English Classes.

How to Cite this Article?

Aydin, S., and Su-Bergil, A. (2023). The First Encounters of Primary School Students and Parents in Blended English Classes. i-manager’s Journal on English Language Teaching, 13(1), 1-21. https://doi.org/10.26634/jelt.13.1.19073

References

[1]. Adas, D., & Bakir, A. (2013). Writing difficulties and new solutions: Blended learning as an approach to improve writing abilities. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 3(9), 254-266.
[2]. Al Zumor, A. W. Q., Al Refaai, I. K., Eddin, E. A. B., & Al-Rahman, F. H. A. (2013). EFL students' perceptions of a blended learning environment: Advantages, limitations and suggestions for improvement. English Language Teaching, 6(10), 95-110.
[9]. Borup, J., Stevens, M. A., & Waters, L. H. (2015). Parent and student perceptions of parent engagement at a Cyber Charter High School. Online Learning, 19(5), 69-91.
[11]. Carr-Chellman, A. A., Dyer, D., & Breman, J. (2000). Burrowing through the network wires: Does distance detract from collaborative authentic learning? Journal of Distance Education, 15(1), 39-62.
[14]. Collopy, R., & Arnold, J. M. (2009). To blend or not to blend: Online only and blended learning environments. Issues in Teacher Education, 18(2), 85-101.
[15]. Connelly, L. M. (2016). Trustworthiness in qualitative research. Medsurg Nursing, 25(6), 435-436.
[16]. Creswell, J. (1994). Research Design: Qualitative & Quantitative Approaches. Sage Publications.
[20]. Donyei, Z. (2007). Research Methods in Applied Linguistics. Oxford University, New York.
[25]. Graham, C. R. (2006). Blended learning systems. In Bonk, C. J., & Graham, C. R. (Eds.), The Handbook of Blended Learning: Global Perspectives, Local Designs (pp. 3-21). John Wiley & Sons.
[28]. Kim, K. J., Bonk, C. J., Teng, Y. T., Zeng, T., & Oh, E. (2006). Future trends of blended learning in workplace learning settings across different cultures. 29th Annual Proceedings, Dallas, TX, 1, 176-183.
[29]. Lee, K. K., & Chong, M. P. (2007, August). An Observational study on blended learning for Japanese language studies in a local university in Hong Kong. In Workshop on Blended Learning (pp. 88-100).
[34]. Mertens, D. M. (2019). Research and Evaluation in Education and Psychology: Integrating Diversity with Quantitative, Qualitative, and Mixed Methods. Sage publications.
[35]. Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook. Sage.
[40]. Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric Theory. McGraw-Hill, New York.
[42]. Oztok, M., & Brett, C. (2011). Social presence and online learning: A review of the research. The Journal of Distance Education, 25(3), 1-10.
[43]. Picciano, A. G. (2002). Beyond student perceptions: Issues of interaction, presence, and performance in an online course. Journal of Asynchronous Learning, 6(1), 21-40.
[44]. Polit, D. F., & Beck, C. T. (2010). Essentials of Nursing Research: Appraising Evidence For Nursing Practice. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
[46]. Rianto, A. (2020). Blended learning application in higher education: EFL learners' perceptions, problems, and suggestions. Indonesian Journal of English Language Teaching and Applied Linguistics, 5(1), 55-68.
[47]. Riel, J., Lawless, K. A., & Brown, S. W. (2016). Listening to the teachers: Using weekly online teacher logs for ROPD to identify teachers' persistent challenges when implementing a blended learning curriculum. Journal of Online Learning Research, 2(2), 169-200.
[48]. Rooney, J. E. (2003). Knowledge Infusion how associations are pursuing blended learning opportunities to enhance educational programming and meetings. Association Management, 55(5), 26-32.
[55]. Siko, J., & Barbour, M. (2014). Design research using game design as an instructional strategy. Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 25(3), 427-448.
[60]. Thorne, K. (2003). Blended Learning: How to Integrate Online & Traditional Learning. Kogan Page Publishers.
[61]. Wayer, N., Crippen, K., & Dawson, K. (2015). Design and enactment of online components during four blended learning courses. Journal of Online Learning Research, 1(2), 219-239.
[62]. Whiteside, A. L., Dikkers, A. G. & Lewis, S. (2016). “More confident going into college”: Lessons learned from multiple stakeholders in a new blended learning initiative. Online Learning, 20(4), 136-156.
[65]. Yılmaz, E., Güner, B., Mutlu, H., Doğanay, G., & Yılmaz, D. (2020). Veli Algısına Göre Pandemi Dönemi Uzaktan Eğitim Sürecinin Niteliği. Palet Yayınları, Konya.
[66]. Zhang, W., & Zhu, C. (2018). Comparing learning outcomes of blended learning and traditional face-toface learning of university students in ESL courses. International Journal on E-Learning, 17(2), 251-273.
If you have access to this article please login to view the article or kindly login to purchase the article

Purchase Instant Access

Single Article

North Americas,UK,
Middle East,Europe
India Rest of world
USD EUR INR USD-ROW
Pdf 35 35 200 20
Online 35 35 200 15
Pdf & Online 35 35 400 25

Options for accessing this content:
  • If you would like institutional access to this content, please recommend the title to your librarian.
    Library Recommendation Form
  • If you already have i-manager's user account: Login above and proceed to purchase the article.
  • New Users: Please register, then proceed to purchase the article.