References
[1].Anderson, R. E., &Dexter, S. (2005). School technology leadership: An empirical investigation of prevalence and effect. Educational Administration Quarterly, 41(1), 49- 82.
[3]. Bliss, T.J. & Bliss, L.L. (2003). Attitudinal Response to Teacher Professional Development for the Effective Integration of Educational Technology. Journal of In- Service Education, 29(i ), 81 -99.
[4]. Bottoms, G., & O'Neill, K. (2001). Preparing a new breed of school principals: It's time for action. Atlanta, GA: Southern Regional Education Board.
[5]. Cameron, K. S., Quinn, R. E., DeGraff, J., &Thakor, A. V. (2006). Competing values leadership: Creating value in organizations. Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar.
[6]. Cotton, K., (2003). Principals and student achievement: What the research says. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
[7]. Council of Chief State School Officers [CCSSO). (1 996). Interstate School Leaders Licensure Consortium standards for school leaders. Washington, DC: Author.
[9]. Day, C., Harris, A., Hadfield, M., Tolley, H., & Beresford, J. (2000). Leading schools in times of change. Philadelphia, PA: Open University Press.
[10]. Davies, FE, & Coates G. (2005). Competing conceptions and values in school strategy: Rational planning and beyond. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 33(1 ) 1 09-1 24.
[11]. Griffin, J. (2003). Schools as organizational models: Implications for examining school effectiveness. ElementarySchoolJournal, l04(1), 29-47.
[12]. Hallinger, R, & Heck, R.H. (1998). Exploring the principal's contribution to school effectiveness: 1980- 1995. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 9(2),157-191.
[13]. Johnson, R.B., & Onwuegbuzie, A.J. (2004). Mixed methods research: A research paradigm whose time has come. Educational Researcher, 33(7) 14-26.
[16]. Lowther, D. L., & Ross, 3. M. (2001). Survey of Computer Use [SCU]. Memphis, TN: Centerfor Research in Educational Policy, The University of Memphis.
[17]. Marzano, R., Waters, T., & McNulty, B. (2005). School leadership that works: From research to results. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
[18]. Meltzer, J. & Sherman, T.M. (1997). Ten commandments for successful technology implementation and staff development. NASSP Bulletin, 81(585), 23-32
[19]. National Association of Secondary School Principals. (2004). Breaking ranks ll: Strategies for leading high schoolreform. Reston,VA: Author.
[20]. Quinn, R.E. (1984). Applying the competing values approach to leadership: Toward an integrative framework. In J.G. Hunt, D.M. Hosking, C.A. Schriesheim, & R. Steward (Eds.), Leaders and Managers: International Perspectives on Managerial Behavior and Leadership (pp. 10-27]. NewYork: Pergamon.
[21]. Quinn, R.E. (1988). Beyond rational management: Mastering the paradoxes and competing demands of high performance. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
[22]. Quinn, R.E., Faerman, S.R., Thompson, M.R, McGrath, M.R., &St. Clair, L.S. (2007). Becomingamaster manager: A competing values approach (4"” Ed.). New York: Wiley.
[23]. Quinn, R.E., & Rohrbaugh, J. (1983). Aspatial model of effectiveness criteria: Towards a competing values approach in organizational analysis. Management Science, 29(3), 363-377.
[24]. Ross, 3. M., Smith, L. J., & Alberg, M. (1999). The School Observation Measure [SOM©]. Memphis, TN: Center for Research in Educational Policy, The University of Memphis.
[25]. Schiller, J. (2002). Interventions by School Leaders in Effective Implementation of Information and Communications Technology: perceptions of Australian principals. Journal of Information Technology for Teacher Education, '11(3), 289- 301 .
[26]. Sterbinsky, A., Ross, 5. M. & Burke, D., (2004). Tennessee EdTech Accountability Model [TEAM] Reliability Study. The CNA Corporation, Alexandria, VA.
