i-manager Publications

Key Factors Influencing Supply Chain-Collaborative Innovation for Sustainable Supply Chain Performance: A Case of Logistics Sector in Delhi NCR Region

A. V. Nageswara Rao*

OM & SCM Department, School of Business Studies, Sharda University, Uttar Pradesh, India.

Periodicity:March - May'2021
DOI : https://doi.org/10.26634/jmgt.15.4.18253

Abstract

The unprecedented global business environment has resulted in complex competitive business scenario paving the way for supply chain collaborative innovations in global markets. It is inevitable for all the stake holders in the Supply Chain to collaborate to achieve Sustainable Supply Chain performance. Systematic sampling method is used to collect the primary data from active Managers working in logistics organizations of Delhi NCR Region. The valid sample size is 120 for the study. Correlation analysis is conducted to examine the degree of correlation among the variables, and further Hierarchical Regression Analysis is performed to observe the specific causal relationship among the independent and dependent variable sustainable supply chain performance. The results further suggest a framework for consultants, practitioners, policymakers in the logistics sector and contribute to the Literature in the area of sustainable supply chain performance.

Keywords

Supply Chain Collaborative Innovation, Global Business Environment, Sustainable Supply Chains, Sustainable Supply Chain Performance.

How to Cite this Article?

Rao, A. V. N. (2021). Key Factors Influencing Supply Chain-Collaborative Innovation for Sustainable Supply Chain Performance: A Case of Logistics Sector in Delhi NCR Region. i-manager's Journal on Management, 15(4), 20-30. https://doi.org/10.26634/jmgt.15.4.18253

References

[1]. Bagozzi, R. P., & Yi, Y. (2012). Specification, evaluationand interpretation of structural equation models. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 40(1), 8-34.

[2]. Barratt, M. (2004). Understanding the meaning of collaboration in the supply chain. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 9(1), 30-42.

[3]. Beske, P. (2012). Dynamic capabilities and sustainable supply chain management. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 42(4), 372–387.

[4]. Cao, M., & Zhang, Q. (2011). Supply chain collaboration: Impact on collaborative advantage and firm performance. Journal of Operations Management, 29(3), 163-180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jom.2010.12.008

[5]. Carter, C. R., & Rogers, D. S. (2008). A framework of sustainable supply chain management: Moving toward new theory. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 38(5), 360–387.

[6]. Hassini, E., Surti, C., & Searcy, C. (2012). A literature review and a case study of sustainable supply chains with a focus on metrics. International Journal of Production Economics, 140(1), 69-82.

[7]. He, Y., Wang, H., Guo, Q., & Xu, Q. (2019). Coordination through cooperative advertising in a two-period consumer electronics supply chain. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 50, 179-188.

[8]. Huo, B., Qi, Y., Wang, Z., & Zhao, X. (2014). The impact of supply chain integration on firm performance: The moderating role of competitive strategy. Supply Chain Management, 19(4), 369-384.

[9]. Jermsittiparsert, K., Sriyakul, T., & Sangperm, N. (2019). The influence of customer and technology supply chain integration on social sustainable performance with moderating role of organizational structure. International Journal of Supply Chain Management, 8(3), 71-82.

[10]. Kumar, G., Subramanian, N., & Arputham, R. M. (2018). Missing link between sustainability collaborative strategy and supply chain performance: Role of dynamic capability. International Journal of Production Economics, 203, 96-109.

[11]. Lambert, D. M., Cooper, M. C., & Pagh, J. D. (1998). Supply chain management: implementation issues and research opportunities. The International Journal of Logistics Management, 9(2), 1-20.

[12]. Lin, R. J., Tan, K. H., & Geng, Y. (2013). Market demand, green product innovation, and firm performance: Evidence from Vietnam motorcycle industry. Journal of Cleaner Production, 40, 101-107.

[13]. Maestrini, V., Luzzini, D., Caniato, F., Maccarrone, P., & Ronchi, S. (2018). Measuring supply chain performance: a lifecycle framework and a case study. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 38(4), 934-956.

[14]. Malone, T. W., & Crowston, K. (1994). The interdisciplinary study of coordination. ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR), 26(1), 87-119.

[15]. Mangun, D., & Thurston, D. L. (2002). Incorporating component reuse, remanufacture, and recycle into product portfolio design. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 49(4), 479-490.

[16]. Saarinen, J. (2014). Critical sustainability: Setting the limits to growth and responsibility in tourism. Sustainability, 6(1), 1-17.

[17]. Sahu, A. K., Datta, S., & Mahapatra, S. S. (2017). Evaluation of performance index in resilient supply chain: A fuzzy-based approach. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 24 (1), 118-142.

[18]. Samaddar, S., Nargundkar, S., & Daley, M. (2006). Inter-organizational information sharing: The role of supply network configuration and partner goal congruence. European Journal of Operational Research, 174(2), 744- 765.

[19]. Savaskan, R. C., Bhattacharya, S., & Van Wassenhove, L. N. (2004). Closed-loop supply chain models with product remanufacturing. Management Science, 50(2), 239-252.

[20]. Seuring, S. (2011). Supply chain management for sustainable products–insights from research applying mixed methodologies. Business Strategy and the Environment, 20(7), 471-484.

[21]. Seuring, S., & Müller, M. (2008). Core issues in sustainable supply chain management: A Delphi study. Business Strategy and the Environment, 17(8), 455-466.