i-manager Publications

Clustering Technique to Threshold Vegetation Indices and Gap Detection in Hazaribagh Wildlife Sanctuary, Jharkhand (India)

Saurabh Kumar Gupta*, A. C. Pandey**

* PhD Scholar, Center for Land Resource Management, Central University of Jharkhand, India.

** Professor, Center for Land Resource Management, Central University of Jharkhand, India.

Periodicity:August - October'2018
DOI : https://doi.org/10.26634/jfet.14.1.15257

Abstract

The K means clustering was processed for threshold vegetation indices and gap detection. It was processed for retrieving the vegetation index value that represents forest land cover, percentage vegetation coverage, and canopy density. The method was further used for finding the probability distribution of forest canopy gaps in the forest. The result was tested in the Hazaribagh Wildlife Sanctuary, Jharkhand, India. The percentage vegetation cover was calculated in the new SNAP software. The canopy density was mapped through FCD model. From the analysis, it was estimated that the dense forest having greater than 70% of canopy density comprises 64-100% of vegetation cover; moderately dense forest having 40-70% canopy density includes 21-64% of vegetation cover, and open forest having less than 40% canopy density have 7-21% of vegetation cover. The Normalized Vegetation Index (NDVI) and Transformed Vegetation Index (TVI) considered being more efficient and Difference Vegetation Index (DVI) was less efficient for forest vegetation cover and density measurement. Inversely, it was observed that DVI was more efficient in finding gaps in the forest. The method was also functional for finding the probability distribution of canopy gaps in the forest. This clustering technique can be applied in other means for forest landscape level assessment.

Keywords

K-means Clustering, Vegetation Indices, Forest Cover, Canopy Density, Thresholding, Canopy Gaps.

How to Cite this Article?

Gupta, S. K. and Pandey, A. C.(2018). Clustering Technique to Threshold Vegetation Indices and Gap Detection In Hazaribagh Wildlife Sanctuary, Jharkhand (India).i-manager’s Journal on Future Engineering and Technology,14(1), 32-41. https://doi.org/10.26634/jfet.14.1.15257

References

[1]. Addabbo, P., Focareta, M., Marcuccio, S., Votto, C., & Ullo, S. L. (2016). Contribution of Sentinel-2 data for applications in vegetation monitoring. Acta Imeko, 5(2), 44-54.

[2]. Baret, E., Guyot, G., Begue, A., Morel, P., & Podaire, A. (1986). Etude de la complémentarité du moyen infrarouge avec le visible et le proche infrarouge pour le suivi de la végétation. Spectral Signatures of Objects in Remote Sensing, 409-412.

[3]. Blonda, P. N., Pasquariello, G., Losito, S., Mort, A., Posa, F., & Ragno, D. (1991). An experiment for the interpretation of multitemporal remotely sensed images based on a fuzzy logic approach. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 12(3), 463-476.

[4]. Campbell, J. B., & Wynne, R. H. (2011). Introduction to Remote Sensing. Guilford Press.

[5]. Conrad, O., Bechtel, B., Bock, M., Dietrich, H., Fischer, E., Gerlitz, L., ... & Böhner, J. (2015). System for automated geoscientific analyses (SAGA) v. 2.1. 4. Geoscientific Model Development, 8(7), 1991-2007.

[6]. Drusch, M., Del Bello, U., Carlier, S., Colin, O., Fernandez, V., Gascon, F., ... & Meygret, A. (2012). Sentinel-2: ESA's optical high-resolution mission for GMES operational services. Remote Sensing of Environment, 120, 25-36.

[7]. Hartigan, J. A., & Wong, M. A. (1979). Algorithm AS 136: A k-means clustering algorithm. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series C (Applied Statistics), 28(1), 100- 108.

[8]. Lv, Z., Hu, Y., Zhong, H., Wu, J., Li, B., & Zhao, H. (2010, October). Parallel K-means clustering of remote sensing images based on MapReduce. In International Conference on Web Information Systems and Mining (pp. 162-170). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg.

[9]. Matsuyama, T. (1987). Knowledge-based aerial image understanding systems and expert systems for image processing. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, (3), 305-316.

[10]. Ostertag, R. (1998). Belowground effects of canopy gaps in a tropical wet forest. Ecology, 79(4), 1294-1304.

[11]. Rikimaru, A. (1997). Development of forest canopy density mapping and monitoring model using indices of vegetation, bare soil and shadow. Presented Paper for the 18^th ACRS.

[12]. Rikimaru, A., Roy, P. S., & Miyatake, S. (2002). Tropical forest cover density mapping. Tropical Ecology, 43(1), 39- 47.

[13]. Silvertown, J., & Smith, B. (1988). Gaps in the canopy: The missing dimension in vegetation dynamics. Vegetatio, 77(1-3), 57-60.

[14]. Van der Meer, F. D., Van der Werff, H. M. A., & Van Ruitenbeek, F. J. A. (2014). Potential of ESA's Sentinel-2 for geological applications. Remote Sensing of Environment, 148, 124-133.

[15]. Wang, J., Wang, J., Ke, Q., Zeng, G., & Li, S. (2015). Fast Approximate K-Means via Cluster Closures. In Multimedia Data Mining and Analytics (pp. 373-395). Springer, Cham.

	North Americas,UK, Middle East,Europe		India	Rest of world
	USD	EUR	INR	USD-ROW
Pdf	35	35	200	20
Online	35	35	200	15
Pdf & Online	35	35	400	25

Clustering Technique to Threshold Vegetation Indices and Gap Detection in Hazaribagh Wildlife Sanctuary, Jharkhand (India)

Abstract

Keywords

How to Cite this Article?

References

If you have access to this article please login to view the article or kindly login to purchase the article

Purchase Instant Access

Options for accessing this content: