Feedback-Mediated Individual and Collaborative Planning: Effects on Structural Organization and Clarity of Argumentative Essays

Fatemeh Soltanpour*, Mohammadreza Valizadeh **, Fatemeh Ghafarianzirak ***
* University Lecturer, Department of English, Kar Higher Education Institute, Qazvin, Iran
** Ph.D. Candidate, Department of English, Faculty of Foreign Languages, Gazi University, Ankara, Turkey.
*** Department of English Language, Payame Noor University, Tehran, Iran.
Periodicity:April - June'2018
DOI : https://doi.org/10.26634/jelt.8.2.14586

Abstract

This two-week quantitative experimental study aimed at making a comparison among the effects of individual and collaborative pre-task planning, both with and without receiving teacher feedback on structural organization and clarity of argumentative essays. The participants were 120 Iranian English as a Foreign Language (EFL) learners, assigned randomly to five groups (four experimental and one control, with no planning condition). They were given 10 minutes for planning as a pre-writing activity. The individual group did the planning individually, while the collaborative one did it through peer-interaction. There were two more individual and collaborative groups, who also received the teacher feedback during the planning process. The other writing tasks processes were done individually in all groups and in 30 minutes. The results revealed that the four experimental groups outperformed the control one. The collaborative group was significantly better than the individual one, but the two groups who received the teacher feedback had superiority over the others. The findings, which are in line with the social constructivist view of learning, also corroborate the results of previous relevant research papers. Additionally, the findings can be enlightening; the L2 writing teachers can apply the techniques utilized in this research in their classes, and hopefully obtain beneficial results.

Keywords

Collaborative Planning, Individual Planning, Peer-Interaction, Structural Organization of Argumentative Essays, Teacher Feedback.

How to Cite this Article?

Soltanpour, F., Valizadeh , M., and Ghafarianzirak, F. (2018). Feedback-Mediated Individual and Collaborative Planning: Effects on Structural Organization and Clarity of Argumentative Essays. i-manager’s Journal on English Language Teaching, 8(2), 14-26. https://doi.org/10.26634/jelt.8.2.14586

References

[1]. Ajideh, P., Leitner, G., & Yazdi-Amirkhiz, S. Y. (2016). The influence of collaboration on individual writing quality: The case of Iranian vs. Malaysian college students. Journal of English Language Teaching and Learning, 17, 1-24.
[2]. Ameri-Golestan, A., & Dousti, E. (2015). Collaborative vs. individual task planning and Iranian EFL learners' writing performance. International Journal of Foreign Language Teaching and Research, 3(12), 25-40.
[3]. Batstone, R. (2005). Planning as discourse activity: A sociocognitive view. In R. Ellis (Ed.), Planning and Task Performance in a Second Language (pp. 277-295). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
[4]. Benko, S. L. (2012). Scaffolding: An ongoing process to support adolescent writing development. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 56(4), 291–300. https://doi.org/10.1002/JAAL.00142
[5]. Cheng, Y. S. (2004). EFL students' writing anxiety: Sources and implications. English Teaching & Learning, 29(2), 41-62.
[6]. Crookes, G. (1989). Planning and interlanguage variation. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 11(4), 367-383. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263100008391
[7]. Cumming, A. (2001). Learning to write in a second language: Two decades of research. International Journal of English Studies, 1(2), 1-23.
[8]. Devine, J., Railey, K., & Boshoff, P. (1993). The implications of cognitive models in L1 and L2 writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 2(3), 203-225. https://doi.org/10.1016/1060-3743(93)90019-Y
[9]. Dobao, A. F. (2012). Collaborative writing tasks in the L2 classroom: Comparing group, pair, and individual work. Journal of Second Language Writing, 21(1), 40-58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2011.12.002
[10]. Donato, R. (1994). Collective scaffolding in second language learning. In Lantolf, J. P., & Appel, G. (Eds.), Vygoyskiian Approaches to Second Language Research (pp. 33–55). Estport CT: Ablex.
[11]. Ellis, R. (2000). Task-based research and language pedagogy. Language Teaching Research, 4(3), 193-220. https://doi.org/10.1177/136216880000400302
[12]. Ellis, R. (2010). EPILOGUE: A framework for investigating oral and written corrective feedback. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 32(2), 335-349. https://doi.org/ 10.1017/S0272263109990544
[13]. Ellis, R. (2012). Language Teaching Research and Language Pedagogy. West Sussex, UK: Wiley-Blackwell.
[14]. Ellis, R., & Yuan, F. (2004). The effects of planning on fluency, complexity, and accuracy in second language narrative writing. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 26(1), 59-84. https://doi.org/10.10170S0272263104261034
[15]. Elola, I., & Oskoz, A. (2010). Collaborative writing: Fostering foreign language and writing conventions development. Language Learning & Technology, 14(3), 51-71.
[16]. Farahani, A. A. K., & Faryabi, F. (2016). The effects of Pre-task planning on Iranian EFL undergraduates' argumentative writing task performance. English Language Teaching, 3(2), 105-124.
[17]. Field, A. (2013). Discovering Statistics using SPSS (4th Ed.). London: Sage.
[18]. Flower, L. S., & Hayes, J. R. (1981). A cognitive process Theory of writing. College Composition and Communication, 32(4), 365-387. https://doi.org/10.2307/ 356600
[19]. Geranpayeh, A. (2003). A quick review of the English quick placement test. Extract from Research Notes, 12, 8- 10.
[20]. Ghavamnia, M., Tavakoli, M., & Esteki, M. (2013). The effect of pre-task and online planning conditions on complexity, accuracy, and fluency on EFL learners' written production. Porta Linguarum, 20, 31-43.
[21]. Hayes, J. R. (1996). A new framework for understanding cognition and affect in writing. In Levy, C. M., & Ransdell, S. (Eds.), The Science of Writing: Theories, Methods, Individual Differences and Applications (pp. 1- 27). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
[22]. Hayes, J. R., & Nash, J. G. (1996). On the nature of planning in writing. In Levy, C. M., & Ransdell, S. (Eds.), The Science of Writing: Theories, Methods, Individual Differences, and Applications (pp. 29-55). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
[23]. Huwari, I., & Hashima, N. (2011). Writing apprehension in English among Jordanian postgraduate students in UUM. Academic Research International Journal, 1(2), 190-198.
[24]. Hyland, K. (2009). Teaching and Researching Writing nd (2 ed.). Harlow, UK: Pearson Education Limited.
[25]. Jalili, M. H., & Shahrokhi, M. (2017). The effect of collaborative writing on Iranian EFL learners' L2 writing anxiety and attitudes. Journal of Applied Linguistics and Language Research, 4(2), 203-215.
[26]. Johnson, M. D., Mercado, L., & Acevedo, A. (2012). The effect of planning sub-processes on L2 writing fluency, grammatical complexity, and lexical complexity. Journal of Second Language Writing, 21(3), 264-282.
[27]. Johnson, M. D., & Nicodemus, C. L. (2016). Testing a threshold: An approximate replication of Johnson, Mercado & Acevedo 2012. Language Teaching, 49(2), 251-274. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444815000087
[28]. Kellogg, R. T. (1990). Effectiveness of prewriting strategies as a function of task demands. American Journal of Psychology, 103(3), 327-339. https://doi.org/ 10.2307/1423213
[29]. Kellogg, R. T. (1996). A model of working memory in writing. In Levy, C. M., & Ransdell, S. (Eds.), The Science of Writing: Theories, Methods, Individual Differences and Applications (pp. 57-71). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
[30]. Lantolf, J. P., & Thorne, S. L. (2006). Sociocultural Theory and the Genesis of Second Language Development. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
[31]. Larson-Hall, J. (2010). A Guide to doing Statistics in Second Language Research using SPSS. New York, NY: Routledge.
[32]. Lightbown, P. M., & Spada, N. (2006). How Languages rd are Learned (3 Ed.). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
[33]. Lin, W. C., & Yang, S. C. (2011). Exploring students' perceptions of integrating Wiki technology and peer feedback into English writing courses. English Teaching: Practice and Critique, 10(2), 88-103.
[34]. Mackey, A., & Gass, S. M. (2005). Second Language Research: Methodology and Design. Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
[35]. Magogwe, J. M., & Oliver, R. (2007). The relationship between language learning strategies, proficiency, age and self-efficacy beliefs: A study of language learners in Botswana. System, 35(3), 338–352. https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.system.2007.01.003
[36]. Matsuda, P. K., & Silva, T. (2010). Writing. In Schmitt, N. (Ed.), An Introduction to Applied Linguistics (2 nd ed., pp. 232-246). London, UK: Hodder Education.
[37]. Mehnert, L. (1998). The effects of different lengths of time for planning on second language performance. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 20(1), 83-108. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263198001041
[38]. Nishino, T., & Atkinson, D. (2015). Second language writing as sociocognitive alignment. Journal of Second Language Writing, 27, 37-54. https://doi.org/10.1016 /j.jslw.2014.11.002
[39]. Nunan, D. (2004). Task-based Language Teaching. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
[40]. Nyikos, M., & Hashimoto, R. (1997). Constructivist theory applied to collaborative learning in teacher education: In search of ZPD. The Modern Language Journal. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.1997. tb05518.x
[41]. O'Donoghue, T., & Clarke, S. (2010). Leading learning: Process, Themes and Issues in International Contexts. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge.
[42]. O'Malley, M. J., & Chamot, A. U. (1990). Learning Strategies in Second Language Acquisition. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
[43]. Ojima, M. (2006). Concept mapping as pre-task planning: A case study of three Japanese ESL writers. System, 34(4), 566-585. https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.system.2006.08.003
[44]. Pajares, F., & Johnson, M. J. (1994). Confidence and competence in writing: The role of writing self-efficacy, outcome expectancy and apprehension. Research in the Teaching English, 28, 313-331.
[45]. Pallant, J. (2013). SPSS Survival Manual: A Step by Step Guide to Data analysis using IBM SPSS (5th Ed.). Berkshire, England: Open University Press.
[46]. Qashoa, S. H. H. (2014). English writing anxiety: Alleviating strategies. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 136, 59-65. https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.sbspro.2014.05.288
[47]. Rahimpour, M., & Safarie, M. (2011). The effects of online and pre-task planning on descriptive writing of Iranian EFL learners. International Journal of English Linguistics, 1(2), 274-280. https://doi.org/10.5539/ijel.v1n2p274
[48]. Rezaei, A. R., & Lovorn, M. (2010). Reliability and validity of rubrics for assessment through writing. Assessing Writing, 15(1), 18-39. https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.asw.2010.01.003
[49]. Riazi, M., & Rezaii, M. (2011). Teacher- and peerscaffolding behaviors: Effects on EFL students' writing th improvement. In Feryok, A. (Ed.), CLESOL 2010: The 12 National Conference for Community Languages and ESOL (pp. 55-63).
[50]. Robinson, P. (2005). Cognitive complexity and task sequencing: Studies in a componential framework for second language task design. IRAL - International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 43(1), 1-32. https://doi.org/10.1515/iral.2005.43.1.1
[51]. Saslow, J., & Ascher, A. (2012a). Summit 1 (2 nd Ed.). New York, NY: Pearson Education.
[52]. Saslow, J., & Ascher, A. (2012b). Summit 2: English for Today's World (2 nd Ed.). Pearson Education.
[53]. Shehadeh, A. (2011). Effects and student perceptions of collaborative writing in L2. Journal of Second Language Writing, 20(4), 286-305. https://doi.org/10.1016 /j.jslw.2011.05.010
[54]. Shi, L. (1998). Effects of prewriting discussions on adult ESL students' compositions. Journal of Second Language Writing, 7(3), 319-345. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1060- 3743(98)90020-0
[55]. Shin, Y. (2008). The Effects of Planning on L2 Writing: A Study of Korean Learners of English as a Foreign Language (Doctoral Dissertation, University of Iowa).
[56]. Silva, T. (1993). Toward an understanding of the distinct nature of L2 writing: The ESL research and its implications. TESOL Quarterly, 27(4), 657-675. https://doi.org/10.2307/ 3587400
[57]. Skehan, P. (1996). A framework for the implementation of task-based instruction. Applied Linguistics, 17(1), 38-62. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/17.1.38
[58]. Skehan, P., & Foster, P. (1997). Task type and task processing conditions as influences on foreign language performance. Language Teaching Research, 1(3), 185- 211. https://doi.org/10.1177/136216889700100302
[59]. Skehan, P., & Foster, P. (1999). The influence of task structure and processing conditions on narrative retellings. Language Learning, 49(1), 93-120. https://doi.org/ 10.1111/1467-9922.00071
[60]. Skehan, P., & Foster, P. (2001). Cognition and tasks. In Cognition and Second Language Instruction (pp. 183- 205). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
[61]. Storch, N. (2002). Patterns of interaction in ESL pair work. Language Learning, 52(1), 119-158. https://doi.org/ 10.1111/1467-9922.00179
[62]. Storch, N. (2005). Collaborative writing: Product, process, and students' reflections. Journal of Second Language Writing, 14(3), 153-173. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.jslw.2005.05.002
[63]. Storch, N. (2007). Investigating the merits of pair work on a text editing task in ESL classes. Language Teaching Research, 11(2), 143-159. https://doi.org/10.1177/ 1362168807074600
[64]. Storch, N., & Wigglesworth, G. (2007). Writing tasks: The effects of collaboration. In Mayo, M. D. P. G. (Ed.), Investigating Tasks in Formal Language Learning (pp. 157- 177). London, UK: Multilingual Matters.
[65]. Storch, N., & Wigglesworth, G. (2010). Learners' processing, uptake, and retension of corrective feedback on writing: Case studies. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 32, 303-334. https://doi.org/10.1017/ S0272263109990532
[66]. Swain, M. (2000). The output hypothesis and beyond: Mediating acquisition through collaborative dialogue. In Lantolf, J. P., (Ed.), Sociocultural Theory and Second Language Learning (pp. 97-114). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
[67]. Tavakoli, M., & Rezazadeh, M. (2014). Individual and collaborative planning conditions: Effects on fluency, complexity and accuracy in L2 argumentative writing. The Journal of Teaching Language Skills (JTLS), 5(4), 85–110.
[68]. Torrance, M., & Galbraith, D. (2006). The processing demands of writing. In MacArthur, C. A., Graham, S., & Fitzgerald, J. (Eds.), Handbook of Writing Research (pp. 67- 80). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
[69]. Weigle, S. C. (2014). Considerations for teaching second language writing. In Celce-Murcia, M., Rinton, D. M., & Snow, M. A. (Eds.), Teaching English as a Second or Foreign Language (4 th Ed., pp. 222-237). Boston, MA: Heinle Cengage Learning.
[70]. Woo, Y., & Reeves, T. C. (2007). Meaningful interaction in web-based learning: A social constructivist interpretation. Internet and Higher Education, 10(1), 15-25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2006.10.005
[71]. Wu, H. J. (2015). The effects of blog-supported collaborative writing on writing performance, writing anxiety and perceptions of EFL college students in Taiwan (Doctoral Dissertation, University of South Florida). Retrieved from http://scholarcommons.usf.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi? article=6805&context=etd
[72]. Zimmermann, R. (2000). L2 writing: Subprocesses, a model of formulating and empirical findings. Learning and Instruction, 10(1), 73-99. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0959- 4752(99)00019-5
If you have access to this article please login to view the article or kindly login to purchase the article

Purchase Instant Access

Single Article

North Americas,UK,
Middle East,Europe
India Rest of world
USD EUR INR USD-ROW
Pdf 35 35 200 20
Online 35 35 200 15
Pdf & Online 35 35 400 25

Options for accessing this content:
  • If you would like institutional access to this content, please recommend the title to your librarian.
    Library Recommendation Form
  • If you already have i-manager's user account: Login above and proceed to purchase the article.
  • New Users: Please register, then proceed to purchase the article.