From Coercion to Autonomy: Designing a Literature Program for Generation Z Learners

John Paul O. Dela Rosa*
*PhD Scholar, Philippine Normal University - Manila and Master Teacher I, Tarlac National High School – Annex, the Philippines.
Periodicity:July - September'2017
DOI : https://doi.org/10.26634/jelt.7.3.13588

Abstract

The 21st century educational platform clamors for the affordance of learner autonomy and empowerment more than control and coercion. This study, therefore considers the reading preferences, motivations, issues, and other factors that govern the choice of literary texts from the perspectives of students towards designing a relevant literature program. Using both descriptive and developmental research designs as empirical approaches, responses from 59 English as a Second Language (ESL) learners coming from a homogenous, high performing group, were studied and analyzed. The results revealed that respondents generally read for pleasure and that themes related to happiness, adventure, mystery, and other issues relevant among adolescents were more favored. The students also reported that personal choice, contexts of literary texts, and academic workload affect their reading preferences. On a relative note, majority of the respondents were more interested to read novels and narratives written by contemporary, foreign authors, while several would want to learn more about classic, award-winning literary pieces from the Philippines. Based on the data collected, an online literature program for centennials or ‘Generation Z’ students was developed, the Generation Z Online Literature Program (GZOLP). Implications on the use of reading preferences and motivations in teaching literary texts and the rendering of literature programs among adolescent readers and other recommendations for further research are also provided in this paper.

Keywords

Reading Preferences, Learner Motivations, The Teaching of Literature, Literature Program, GZOLP

How to Cite this Article?

Dela Rosa, J.O.D. (2017). From Coercion to Autonomy: Designing a Literature Program for Generation Z Learners. i-manager’s Journal on English Language Teaching, 7(3), 7-21. https://doi.org/10.26634/jelt.7.3.13588

References

[1]. Aharony, N., & Bar-Ilan, J. (2015). Students' reading preferences: An exploratory study. Retrieved on December 24, 2016 from http://meital.iucc.ac.il/conf2015/papers15/ B1_1.pdf
[2]. Almonte et al. (2015). English teacher's guide: Celebrating multiculturalism through world literature. Pasig City: DepEd-IMCS.
[3]. Ballentine, D. & Hill, L. (2000). Teaching beyond once upon a time. Language Arts, 78(1), 11-20.
[4]. Boo, D. & Kaur, N. (2000). The literature component in English Form Four. Bangi: PelangiSdn. Bhd.
[5]. Bouchamma, Y., Poulin, V., Basque, M., & Ruel, C. (2013). Impact of students' reading preferences on reading achievement. Creative Education, 4(8), 484-491.
[6]. Bowen, W. (2013). The potential for online learning: Promises and pitfalls. Retrieved on December 29, 2016 from http://er.educause.edu/articles/2013/10/thepotential- for-online-learning-promises-and-pitfalls
[7]. Burgess, S. A. (1985). Reading but not literature: The Child Read survey. School Library Journal, 31, 27-30.
[8]. Clark, C. & Rumbold, K. (2006). Reading for pleasure: A research overview. Retrieved on December 18, 2016 from http://www.literacytrust.org.uk/assets/0000/0562/ Reading_pleasure_2006.pdf
[9]. Cox, K. E. & Guthrie, J. T. (2001). Motivational and cognitive contributions to students' amount of reading. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 26(1), 116-131.
[10]. DeBlase, G. (2005). Teaching literature and language through guided discovery and informal classroom drama. English Journal, 95(1).
[11]. Gambrell, L. & Marinak, B. (2011). Reading motivation: What the research says. Retrieved on December 28, 2016 from http://www.readingrockets.org/ article/reading-motivation-what-research-says
[12]. Gouvernement du Québec (2005). Profiles of secondary school readers: Concerted action to support reading research. Ministère de l'Édu- cation, du Loisiret du Sport.
[13]. Guthrie, J. T. & Wigfield, A. (2000). Engagement and motivation in reading. In M. Kamil, R. Barr, P. Mosenthal, & P. D. Pearson (Eds.), Handbook of Reading Research (3, 403- 422). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
[14]. Gwin, T. (1990). Language skills through literature. English Teaching Forum, 28(7), 10-17.
[15]. Hamjah, S. H., Ismail, Z., Rasit, R. M., & Rozali, E. A. (2011). Methods of increasing learning motivation among students. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 18, 138-147.
[16]. Holden, J. (2004). Capturing cultural value: How culture has become a tool of government policy. Retrieved on January 2, 2017 from http://www.demos. co.uk/files/ CapturingCulturalValue.pdf
[17]. Horner, C. (2014). The trends that will shape the future of curriculum. Retrieved on January 2, 2017 from https://ww2.kqed.org/mindshift/2011/02/04/three-trendsthat- will-shape-the-future-of-curriculum/
[18]. Hussain, I. & Munshi, P. (2011). Identifying reading preferences of secondary school students. Creative Education, 2(5), 429-434.
[19]. Isa, N. H. & Mahmud, C. T. (2012). Literary texts for Malaysian secondary schools: Needs versus policy. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 2(7), 76-86.
[20]. Keshta, A. S. (2000). Alternative approaches for teaching English literature to undergraduate students in Gaza Strip (Unpublished PhD Thesis, University of Houston, USA).
[21]. Kraaykamp, G. (2003). Literary socialization and reading preferences: Effects of parents, the library, and the school. Poetics, 31(3), 235-257.
[22]. Lirca, C. A. (2014). Generating motivation for the study of literature at university. Retrieved on December 19, 2016 from http://www.upm.ro/facultati_departamente/ stiinte_litere/conferinte/situl_integrare_europeana/Lucrari/ IETM5_Part83.pdf
[23]. Manning, M. L. & Bucher, K. T. (2012). Teaching in the th Middle School (4 ed). Boston: Pearson.
[24]. Mead, M. (2012). Reading motivation: The differences between boys and girls and their reading preferences (Unpublished Master's Thesis. St. John Fisher College).
[25]. Moyer, K. (2010). How is the Internet changing the way you think? Retrieved on January 2, 2017 from https://www.edge.org/responses/how-is-the-internetchanging- the-way-you-think
[26]. National Literacy Trust (2012). Children's and young people's reading in 2012. Retrieved on December 23, 2016 from http://www.literacytrust.org.uk/assets/0001/8829/ Young_people_s_reading_2012_- _Final.pdf
[27]. Nilsen, A. P. & Donelson, K. L. (2005). Literature for today's young adults (8 edition). USA: Pearson Education, Inc.
[28]. Park, Y. (2004). Glossont: A concept-focused ontology building tool. In Proceedings of the 9 International Conference on the Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning (KR), 498-506.
[29]. Pieper, I. (2006). The teaching of literature. Retrieved on December 23, 2016 from https://www.coe.int/t/dg4/ linguistic/Source/Pieper_EN.doc.
[30]. Richey, R. C., Klein, J., & Nelson, W. (2004). Developmental research: Studies of instructional design and development. In D. Jonassen (Ed.), Handbook of Research for Educational Communications and Technology (2 ed.) (pp. 1099-1130). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
[31]. Roe, B. D. & Ross, E. P. (2010). Benefits of literature. Retrieved on December 19, 2016 from http://www.education.com/reference/article/benefitsliterature/
[32]. Rosenblatt, L. (1995). Literature as exploration. New York: MLA. (Original work published 1938).
[33]. Routman, R. (2003). Reading essentials: The specifics you need to teach reading well. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
[34]. Taccone, L. (2015). The digital native advantage. Retrieved on January 2, 2017 from https://kentcomm studiesblog.wordpress.com/2015/03/31/the-digital-nativeadvantage/
[35]. The British Council. (2014). Using literature - An introduction. Retrieved on December 23, 2016 from https://www.teachingenglish.org.uk/article/using-literatureintroduction
[36]. The Literary Encyclopedia. (2016). Exploring literature, history and culture. Retrieved on December 18, 2016 from https://www.litencyc.com/litencycdescribed.php
[37]. Toshalis, E. & Nakkula, M. J. (2012). Motivation, engagement, and student voice. Retrieved on January 2, 2017 from http://www.studentsatthecenter.org/sites/scl.dldev. com/files/Motivation%20Engagement%20Student%2 0Voice_0.pdf.
[38]. Wahyudi, (2013). Literature Appreciation. Retrieved on January 2, 2017 from http://wahyudi.over-blog.com/
[39]. Wilson, R. J. (1985). Children's classics: A reading preference study of fifth and sixth graders. Dissertation Abstracts International, 47.
[40]. Wisniewski, D. (1996). Standards, literary elements, and book selection. Retrieved on January 3, 2017 from http://catalogue.pearsoned.ca/assets/hip/us/hip_us_pear sonhighered/samplechapter/0132202964.pdf.
[41]. Worthy, J. & McKool, S. (1996). Students who say they hate to read: The importance of opportunity, choice, and access. In D.J. Leu, C.K. Kinzer, & K.A. Hinchman (Eds.), Literacies for the 21 century: Research and Practice. 45 yearbook of the National Reading Conference (pp. 245- 256). Chicago: National Reading Conference.
[42]. Yahaya, N., Yahaya, A., Ramli, J., Hashim, S., & Zakariya, Z. (2010). The effects of extrinsic motivation factors in learning among students in secondary school in Negeri Sembilan. International Journal of Psychological Studies, 2(1), 128-136.
If you have access to this article please login to view the article or kindly login to purchase the article

Purchase Instant Access

Single Article

North Americas,UK,
Middle East,Europe
India Rest of world
USD EUR INR USD-ROW
Pdf 35 35 200 20
Online 35 35 200 15
Pdf & Online 35 35 400 25

Options for accessing this content:
  • If you would like institutional access to this content, please recommend the title to your librarian.
    Library Recommendation Form
  • If you already have i-manager's user account: Login above and proceed to purchase the article.
  • New Users: Please register, then proceed to purchase the article.